Chelsea Handler got into a war of words with the popular photo sharing platform Instagram on Thursday night, saying that the app’s policies about user content are sexist.
The feud began when Handler posted a photo of herself mocking an iconic
photo of Russian President Vladimir Putin sitting shirtless atop a
horse. In Handler’s version, the comic staged a shot just like Putin’s,
featuring her own image, sitting on a horse, shirtless, with the caption
“Anything a man can do, a woman has the right to do better. #kremlin.”
The photo – in which Handler’s
nipples were exposed – remained on Instagram for about 30 minutes
before administrators removed it, sending Handler a message saying her
post was pulled from the app for violating the social media platform’s
community guidelines.
Chelsea Handler pushed Americans forward
in our struggle to get over hang-ups about exposed female nipples on
Thursday night. On Instagram, Handler posted a photo of herself
parodying Russian president Vladimir Putin's famous topless horse-riding
photo. Instagram, not appreciating the hard work that had to have gone
into getting Handler on a horse with her boobs out, took the picture
down. Handler protested, putting up a screenshot of the "community
guidelines" warning she got, writing, "If a man posts a photo of his
nipples, it's ok, but not a woman? Are we in 1825?"
To
be fair, I think that both men and women generally felt, in 1825, like
they couldn't walk around with their nipples out. (A couple decades
before is a different story, as see-through dresses were the rage in the very early 1800s.
The more you know!) But her larger point stands: Men are so free to
share their nipples with the world that world leaders have no problem
letting everyone know what they've got going on under their suits and
ties, but women's nipples are still treated like looking at them in
public might blind you.
This
discrepancy cannot be explained solely by the fact that women grow
breasts as a secondary sex characteristic. After all, men aren't
required to hide their secondary sex characteristics (beards) from the
world in shame, though many parts of Brooklyn would be more
aesthetically pleasing if they would. Not to mention that the parts of
the chest area that are woman-only—the non-nipple parts—are not only
acceptable but welcome in public spaces. Cleavage is one of the
longest-standing popular accessories a woman can employ. The only part
of a woman's chest that is considered too daring to display is the part
that we share with men, the nipple.
The
taboo around the nipple encapsulates how ridiculous and contradictory
our expectations about women, fashion, and sexuality really are. On the
one hand, women are expected to be sexually appealing, even to the point of mutilating our feet to achieve that forever-sexy mystique. But we're also expected to avoid being too sexual, or else we're considered scandalous. The conflicting demands reduce us to counting inches of cloth and
arbitrarily deciding that the nipple is a step too far. We'd all be
better off in a more sensible society where women could walk around
topless to look sexy but wearing 3-inch heels was considered over the
top.
I'm not sure if Handler knew it, but she has come out in support of the Free the Nipple campaign,
which supports public breast-feeding and fights against laws banning
nipples in public. I don't have the ovaries myself to buck the system
and walk around nipples out. But that's all the more reason I salute
nipple warriors like Handler and Rihanna, who show it off and don't care
what you think about it. Perhaps they will be trailblazers, creating a
new world where women can wear whatever the hell they want without
worrying about a "wardrobe malfunction."
No comments:
Post a Comment