Green Bay Packers' 42-10 win over the Minnesota Vikings. There's good reason to, since the Vikings were not only without running back Adrian Peterson,
but also newly minted starting quarterback Teddy Bridgewater and tight
end Kyle Rudolph as well. Indeed, in a vacuum, it's almost impossible to
treat this anything like the preseason contest it looked like. Heck, we
even got a backup quarterback Matt Flynn sighting. Yet, can we fault
the Packers for the team the opponent put on the field? Is it somehow
their fault that Vikings third-string quarterback Christian Ponder had
only a couple of days to prepare and wasn't that good in the first
place? Should the Packers have handed the Vikings' turnovers back to
them to earn this win that much more?
As Green Bay head coach Mike McCarthy stated after the game,
"Excellent team victory tonight. We feel good about what we
accomplished as a football team. Clearly a dominant win." And it was.
In an NFL of such parity, it's important for the haves to not let up
against the have-nots. The Packers didn't, and let's not take that away
from them. Let's not look at this win simply in a vacuum. Let's put
this win in the context of the Packers' entire season. This victory
comes on the heels of the Packers' 38-17 curb-stomping of the Chicago Bears.
For those keeping track at home, that's two straight blowout victories
against division opponents. Against Chicago, the Packers didn't have to
punt. Against Minnesota, the Packers barely had to show up.
This
win brings the Packers to 3-2 with a slate of games against struggling
opponents between now and the bye. They go to Miami to play the Dolphins, host the Carolina Panthers at home and then have the misfortune of traveling to New Orleans to play the Saints,
where Sean Payton's club benefits from one of the league's best
home-field advantages. If the Packers can get out of their own way (you
know, like they didn't against the Detroit Lions), 3-0 is a real
possibility, and 2-1 is a darn-near certainty. The brilliance of this
victory—and the real reason we can draw any information from it at
all—is that the Vikings entered the week with the ninth overall scoring
defense in the league. Chicago, whom the Packers trounced with an
offensive explosion last week, isn't in the same defensive class it once
was under Lovie Smith. The big reveal of the Green Bay-Chicago game was
that the Packers defense (especially their pass rush and cornerback Sam
Shields, who had a rough start to the season) wasn't nearly as bad as
it had looked through the first few weeks.
Against
the Vikings, though, it is almost impossible not to start feeling good
vibrations about an offense that had struggled against good defenses in
Detroit and Seattle. Quarterback Aaron Rodgers only threw the ball 17
times, completing 12 passes for 156 yards and three touchdowns. He had a
number of effective throws off play action, and the Packers spread the
ball around, hitting nine different receivers and three different
players for touchdowns. Those aren't lofty yardage numbers, but they
didn't need to be, as Rodgers gave way to Flynn, who somehow found a way
to make the Vikings defense look good again. After three weeks, it
was en vogue to write off the Packers...no longer. There are
still legitimate concerns with Green Bay, don't get me wrong. This is
still a defense built around pass rushing a dropback passer that will
likely have some trouble with mobile quarterbacks like Carolina's Cam Newton in the coming weeks and whomever it might face when it reaches the playoffs (yes, when...not if).
The
offensive line still has plenty of growing up to do and is a remarkably
shallow unit. Lacy's struggles early on in the year are directly
connected to deficiencies up front. Those sort of problems could cause
trouble against a number of teams left on the Packers' schedule,
including Carolina and another game against Detroit. The Packers may not
be this kind of unstoppable juggernaut week in and week out, but it's
clear they are to be taken seriously with the rest of the NFL's best.
No comments:
Post a Comment