A South African judge on Friday found Oscar Pistorius guilty of culpable
homicide, or negligent killing, in the shooting death of girlfriend
Reeva Steenkamp and declared him not guilty of murder and premeditated
murder. Judge Thokozile Masipa said Friday that the
double-amputee athlete was not guilty of murder, as prosecutors had
alleged. She ordered Pistorius to stand before she delivered the
verdict. On Valentine’s Day last year, when the pictures of Pistorius being
led in to the back of a police van, the question seemed simple enough.
Did he know it was Reeva behind the door? Matters have since become
rather more complicated, but to that question, there is now an answer.
No. The state, in the form of the prosecutor Gerrie Nel, could not
provide any proof to the contrary.
Judge Masipa’s conclusion had
been made plain the day before, but on Friday morning, Pistorius was
asked to stand up to be told as much. And while the tears from the
friends and family of his deceased girlfriend grew louder, Judge
Thokozile Masipa told him: “The unanimous decision of this court is the
following. The accused is found not guilty [of murder] and is
discharged. Instead he is found of guilty of culpable homicide.”On
the three lesser gun charges, Pistorius was found not guilty on two
counts, and guilty on one. On the charge of firing his gun through the sunroof of a car in 2010, the proof was not there. On the
unlicensed ammunition found in the safe at his home – which he said had
belonged to his father, who did have a licence for it – Judge Masipa
said there was no “criminal intention” to his possession of it. But on
the charge of unknowingly or accidentally discharging a firearm under
the table in a restaurant just a few weeks before he shot and killed Ms
Steenkamp, there was clear evidence of negligence and he was found
guilty.

No comments:
Post a Comment